Dies ist eine alte Version des Dokuments!
(Image: https://www.simbirsoft.com/upload/medialibrary/5a4/drwak2gcztsfkpgldoxgzq6fr6b4wp8t/skhema.jpg)
When deciding how to grow your development capacity many teams face a critical decision: should they invest in hiring more developers or embrace visual development tools for faster output? Each option offers distinct advantages, but the right choice often depends on your goals, resources, and timeline.
Hiring additional developers brings deep technical expertise and long term flexibility. A skilled developer can create tailored applications, enhance system efficiency, and sustain intricate architectures for years. However, the hiring process is slow. It takes weeks to source, interview, and onboard new team members. Even after they start, there’s a ramp up period before they become fully productive. Salaries, benefits, and infrastructure costs add up quickly, especially in competitive markets. For teams operating in fast-paced environments, this route can feel too heavy and too slow.
Low code platforms offer a different approach. These tools let non technical team members—like domain experts and end users—develop real-world solutions using point-and-click builders, reusable widgets, and template libraries. This reduces dependency on engineering teams and shortens time-to-market. A basic form processor or reporting tool that might take a developer hours of coding to finalize can be deployed within 24–48 hours with visual development software. The platform automates backend logic, hosting, and compliance, empowering anyone to build apps.
The true advantage of low-code is enabling broader collaboration. Rather than creating dependency on a single dev group, a wider range of stakeholders can build solutions. This leads to quicker feedback loops, tighter integration of user requirements and system design, and less translation error.
However, low-code has limitations. Enterprise-grade applications needing advanced logic, нужна команда разработчиков real-time processing, or legacy API connections may still need hand-coded solutions. But for frequent scenarios like intake forms, workflow approvals, internal dashboards, and client portals, low code platforms deliver robust, scalable results without requiring extensive coding resources.
Many organizations find success by combining both approaches. Use visual tools for repetitive, routine applications and let engineers concentrate on innovation and core systems. This dual-track strategy improves efficiency and accelerates delivery.
In the current era of rapid change, agility is non-negotiable. Recruiting talent builds capacity over time. Low-code acts as a productivity amplifier. Choosing one over the other isn’t always an either or decision. Often, the smartest move is to empower non-developers to build what they need—and direct your engineers toward high-impact, complex challenges.